Spilling God’s Fruit
A week ago, I wrote about how I’ve struggled with writing honestly about my own experiences on this blog. I had, in fact, put the blog on sabbatical while I thought about and dealt with my everyday life, and issues that are peculiar to my own family. And, then, I’ve wrangled with developmental concerns that influence many women of my age. Turning 50 was a ringing alarm clock for me; I could see that my life had sped by and was careening on at a breakneck speed. The next 30 years of my life, if I have 30 left, will pass just that quickly, too. What will I make of them?
As well, I’ve been stuck, stuck because I gave up one career to pick up another in order to provide for our large family; stuck because my daughter died and I was changed in unalterable ways and could not return to who I was before her death; stuck because by middle age I had already done all I’d ever planned or wanted to do in my life, yet found I was still alive and had many years of living ahead of me, with not a clue as to what I ought to be doing. I could not return to my old life, but a new life had not yet arrived.
I felt blue and displaced, like a nomad in my own life. I didn’t know what to do with myself or this blog, so I went AWOL. Via email, a blogging friend encouraged me to blog about my journey, because she had received a lot of help and support from other bloggers when she did so.
I thought about her advice for awhile and decided it was good advice. I returned to blogging with a renewed interest in writing about my life, my feelings and perceptions. One of the first things I wrote after my sabbatical was titled simply “Birth Mother.” This post was about my daughter, Mari’s, recent contact with her birth mother and her decision to reject ongoing relationship. Although the post was clearly only about one particular adopted person, one particular birth mother, and one particular adoptive mother (me), the post nevertheless created controversy among a handful of people who flocked here and attacked me because they generalized what I wrote to all mothers who have given children up through adoption.
Many comments were made, and many, if not most, were mean-spirited, judgmental, angry, and unkind. Some of my reactions were among these. Though objectionable posts were removed, and most of us made peace via email, still, something about the situation rankled me. Something was not right.
This week my entertaining and amusing foray into the fashion world, in which I learned What Not to Wear, converged with my writerly and spiritual selves through the realization that what I offer to others is offered as an image. This is true: What I offer to others, I offer as an image. This leads me to ask myself, “How am I representing the self God created and has transformed? Am I doing an adequate job?”
Lately, I have had to answer “not as well as I might” to these questions. The images I’ve presented in the recent past have been haphazard, whimsical, and sometimes reactionary rather than single-minded, purposeful, and focused. I’ve not been a good steward of the treasure of my self because in the past I developed a habit of confusing my self with my image, rather than developing a self that projected its own true image. I need to continue to cultivate new habits of being and living.
The word image comes from the Latin word imago, meaning a copy or likeness. If what I wear, say, write, and do are not accurate copies or likenesses of my self, then what are they? They are all still images, pictures and representations of something. If I’m thoughtless or careless about what I wear, for example, I will put on any old thing; or perhaps I’ll wear whatever’s in “style,” but in any case I will be like the Andy Sachs character in The Devil Wears Prada, and leave home having been dressed by the people in the fashion industry.
This is not the likeness of the me that God created and has called according to His purpose.
Makeover
All that I’ve learned recently about image and appearance finally trickled down to my spirit. Just as I’ve been going through my closets and drawers, tossing, donating, and tailoring my clothing, so too do I see the need for ongoing revitalizations of my environment, both inner and outer.
To that end, I’ve gone through Third Eve and deleted everything, comments and all, that did not provide an accurate image of who I am, or of who the commentators are who regularly read this blog, and whose blogs I read. A few days ago, I thought that leaving our recent posts up, along with the comments, was the best course. They did, after all, illustrate some sort of truth about human nature.
But what they did not do was to provide true likenesses of the precious human beings involved, regardless of whether the people involved were regulars and friends here, or were rallied here by others to come and attack the woman they objectified through name-calling. Everyone is loved by someone else; everyone is someone’s friend. The fact is, we change our minds about people as we read their entire blogs and get to know them, because we can see their humanity. We are less likely to judge and attack a person whom we know likes us, or a person we know is a good and decent human being. It’s all too easy to make an error in judgment based on a first impression, taken out of the context of another person’s self, even if it is only a partial self as revealed on a blog.
I think this purging of Third Eve is the right decision for me, because what I removed did not and could not offer an accurate likeness of my inner self. What I removed didn’t offer accurate depictions of others, either. As well, some commentators have been so deeply wounded through adoption that they do not yet seem able to present accurate representations of their true, whole selves in their adoption-related writing. Their wounded and unwell selves are keening, lamenting, and sometimes lashing out, as the wounded do when they’re crazed with their own pain. I’ve been there when I’ve been in pain. Even so, a person is more than her pain, more than his opinions at any given moment; we are more than our reactions. So, when our reactions give out an image that does not fit us well, that reaction must go. As the Bible says, “Love covers a multitude of sins.”
Through love, I’ve deleted entire posts and responses to them, because beautiful, precious people offered ugly depictions that were so much less than they could have offered. I erred, too, by carelessly offering less than an accurate depiction of my real self.
I’m going to work harder at trying to produce an accurate likeness of my real self in everything I write. Certainly, people will react to what I write about myself, and projection and other neurotic reactions will still occur. There will always be wounded and unwell people who reel out of control in reaction to others; much of the time, they can’t be stopped or controlled. But I can train and try to exercise self-control in my writing, in my responses to others, and in the way I go along my own path. I determine what imago I give to others as a gift.
I know I don’t want the image I offer to be What Not to Wear. I want what I offer here, and in fact through everything I show and do, to offer something real.


9 responses so far ↓
henitsirk // March 16, 2008 at 2:40 PM |
For some reason, I reacted with shock to the idea that you had deleted posts from your blog. As if it’s carved in stone. As if it’s not a work in progress.
But, a little spring cleaning never hurts. Especially if you look on this blog as a semipublic reflection of your self.
Eve // March 16, 2008 at 5:28 PM |
Anthromama, I think I understand. I felt shocked at myself–as if inhabited by another being. But the truth is that had I been in a social setting where tempers flared and people began to speak in bigoted or rude ways, I would try to defuse the situation. Failing that, I would leave. I wouldn’t allow such meanness under my roof, nor would I speak to a guest in my house–even someone who dropped by uninvited–in the way I did just last week. It’s not that it’s not nice, it’s that it’s not kind and it doesn’t do me or anyone else service.
I’m such a stickler for history, maybe particularly so because I’m an adoptive mother. I keep everything, every shred and bit of history that my adopted children have, because it’s theirs. So it was particularly difficult to delete an entire entry and all its comments from the blog. I had even had a discussion with a commentator about how we perhaps ought to just leave it all up, even though the history showed us making asses of ourselves.
Later, though, I had to look at what “facts” were being presented. We don’t really get something unless we can get it in a context, and so many times the context isn’t what we think it is. I can hardly see my own motivation, much less someone else’s.
I’m probably rambling now but I think I made the right decision. The facts have already gone out in feeds and so it’s all out there somewhere in some form. In the meantime, I’m probably also going to post a new visitors page somewhere to let newcomers know that if they misbehave, they’ll be deleted. Period. All are welcome, but all are not welcome to misbehave.
I’ll see how that goes and report back.
)
henitsirk // March 16, 2008 at 9:07 PM |
You’re a mom of umpteen kids, so you know all about setting boundaries!
Good point about how you wouldn’t have said some of those things in a face-to-face social setting. It’s amazing what context will do–the anonymity of computer messages is a blessing and a curse. How many internet “personae” do I have now? My blog, my LinkedIn profile, my Yahoo groups profile, my Wikipedia profile…. Where do I set the boundaries between them? I keep my blog semi-anonymized so that I feel more free to write there. I would love to link it with my working self, but I just don’t want the two to conflict. I can express my weird anthro self on my blog without scaring away potential clients : )
But then is that really revealing shame or fear of judgment? Am I wearing my true clothes if I compartmentalize myself in that way? Why do we sometimes feel the need to only project one part of our selves? Is it appropriate for different contexts, or is it a negative kind of splitting of personality?
There you go again, Eve. Here I thought you were talking about clothes. Now look what you’ve made me think! : )
Eve replies:
Anthromama, you bring up a good point, one I’ve thought about a lot myself. For awhile, most notably after I realized I had a real self and had not been giving it to people, I went through a time of insisting that I be my whole, real self all the time in every setting (yes, even when this wasn’t appropriate). It took me awhile to figure out that my stewardship of my real self was just like my stewardship of my money, my time, or (yes) my appearance. I do what needs to be done with my money; some goes here, some goes there. Some is saved; some is given as a gift. Some is expected to bring a return later; some is thrown to the winds with abandon and don’t-look-back.
I seem my use of my identity this same way. As you point out, you have different identities in different places. Having read you for awhile now, I’m going to be bold enough to suggest that all of them are accurate depictions of you–but of part of you, not of all of you. How can we possibly give all of ourselves unless we are making love, or giving birth, or bringing a total, whole self into a total, aware moment in time–which then flees? I think bringing our whole selves into a situation rarely happens because most situations don’t call for showing our whole selves; perhaps they only allow for bringing our whole selves.
I’m not sure. But I do know that I bring part of my real self to this setting, and a different part to that one. Today I have a meeting to go to, and I know which parts of myself to bring to the meeting, and which to cover, because I’ve sized up the situation. I need something from the woman with whom I’m meeting; she also needs something from me. She and I are alike, but we’re also different. I need my differences to be acceptable to her and to make her sympathetic to my cause, while not alienating her or causing her fear. I want her to feel respected and valued, and I want her to want to help me. I know if I shine in all my glory, she will feel shame. Yes, as arrogant as that sounds for me to put into words, I know it’s true.
But the meeting, though not about me, is for me and for the future of my family. I’m the thorny one, going to war for my family. I’ll probably blog about the whole thing later. But my point is that I can’t be to her what I am here on Third Eve; or what I am to my children, or what I am to my husband, my best friend, my banker.
Sometimes, yes, I do hide myself out of shame (though that’s rare now, unless I’ve really blown it and ought to be ashamed of myself!); or out of fear of judgment. There are lots of judgmental people in the world, people who will judge you in harsh and even violent ways even if you try hard to present yourself as you really are. Some people won’t believe you. Some people believe whatever they want. This is how we have such a dangerous world.
I think you hit all the points here (you amaze me!). Yes, when we compartmentalize too much and we’re unconscious or reactionary and we split ourselves apart that way, it is negative and alienating. We lose our true selves. But, when we compartmentalize out of love or service, or prudence, then we are wise stewards of the selves God created. Jesus didn’t reveal himself to all; Moses covered his face after he met God; Sarah was so beautiful that she had to be called the sister of Abraham, rather than his wife. Jesus said, “Don’t cast your pearls before swine,” and I think sometimes we have to realize that our pearls are useless in barnyard settings, and swine appreciate only corn husks or food and water or mud, but they have no use for pearls. We’re to give people what they need, and save the pearls for those who recognize and need pearls.
That’s some of what I think upon reading what you wrote. Thanks so much for offering your thoughts here.
charlotteotter // March 17, 2008 at 1:11 AM |
It’s your blog, and your right to change the rules at any time.
I have struggled with how honest I should be: both in my blog and in real life. I was trained in diplomacy and politeness, but that was a strategy that meant I didn’t always reveal my self. What I’m learning as I get older is that honesty in relationships (and in blogging) is good when combined with integrity. That means being honest when I need to, but without the intention to hurt others.
I think you didn’t intend to hurt others when you posted about Mari, but when they visited here, they felt hurt because of their own experiences and they lashed out. You acted with integrity; they didn’t. It seems to me that you don’t need to change the way you blog about yourself, but that you are changing the way you allow others to react to you.
Eve replies:
Charlotte, you’re right, I didn’t mean to hurt anyone. But you make a great distinction there in your last line, one I hadn’t thought about; that I am changing the way I allow others to react to me on my blog. Yes, that’s true! I didn’t quite get that distinction, but that’s correct. I will write about adoption again. I’ll probably write about my thoughts and feelings about how adoption has worked and is working in our family. So it’s true that what I’m changing is the boundaries of the blog.
Very good, very helpful. Thank you. Your comment was very helpful to me today.
lilalia // March 17, 2008 at 1:47 AM |
I agree with Charlotte. It is your tea party. You are the princess of your blog. We, your readers and advocates of free speech, must behave with proper etiquette. This doesn’t mean restricting ourselves, but expanding our ability to be grand people, with grand hearts and minds. If someone doesn’t understand that the intent of a blog is personal, if they disagree with what a blogger personal viewpoint, then they should stop reading the blog. Thank you for writing the post and, mostly, thank you for continuing with your writing.
Eve replies:
Thanks, Lilalia! I’m of an age where I think I’ve moved from princess to queen, tyvm. ;o) And of course, you’re right. Even though I lose sight of who’s in charge around here from time to time.
I think I’ll post something to this effect on the blog header or somewhere obvious so that I’ll remember to have appropriate boundaries. This isn’t a usenet newsgroup, after all. I like what they say in 12 Step programs: “Take what you like, and leave the rest.” To that I might add, “Disagreement welcome, but unkind or obnoxious comments will be deleted.”
Or something like that. I’m still thinking about it.
Alida // March 17, 2008 at 10:54 AM |
I think it’s a gift that you share your thoughts and experiences on your blog. That your want to share your true self makes it even more special. That you are willing to be flexible, look back and adjust… well, I think that shows how compassionate you are. You are showing compassion for yourself and for others.
I will keep reading and learning.
Eve // March 18, 2008 at 10:24 AM |
Alida, thanks. I keep trying. And I’m heartened that so many others keep trying too; I think I’m in good company with you and others, don’t you?
Alida // March 18, 2008 at 10:36 AM |
Yes, in very good company.
henitsirk // March 18, 2008 at 11:48 AM |
The trick for me is to discern who are the swine and what are my pearls!
What you said about giving birth being a moment of giving your entire self gobsmacked me. I’ve written on my blog about my son’s traumatic birth, and I continue to struggle with why it all happened that way. The other day a pregnant woman said to me that she was very fearful of how things would go at the birth, and of all the things that could go wrong in the interim. I remember thinking, you are not going to have an easy delivery, because your fear will prevent you from relaxing and allowing the experience to happen.
Like I should be thinking that of her! I was fearful on several levels about my son’s birth, and I am pretty sure that my fear was one of several “causes” for what happened.
Now I have another thing to ponder: was my fear a reflection of my unwillingness/inability to give of my entire self? One time I was going through a guided visualization with a friend, and she told me afterwards that she could see that I would never let things go too far, that I always held something in reserve. I wonder what I feel the need to reserve or retain and not give?