But I have stripped Esau bare, I have uncovered his hiding places so that he will not be able to conceal himself. Jeremiah 49:10

Because of the stigma attached to being a Christian brought on by the behaviors of people who say they are Christian but behave otherwise, I usually hesitate before mentioning my faith. I am admittedly not a very good Christian, regardless of how sincere I am. Among my many shortcomings are what my husband calls my “spicy temperament,” which is his kind way of saying I’m passionate and hot-tempered. I also have the very non-Christian tendency to blurt out exactly what’s on my mind or to show it by body language and facial expression, which demonstrates a decided lack of self-control. Regardless of the effects of this sort of self-serving honesty on others, I no longer make many attempts to conceal my true self.
In spite of not being a very good Christian, I am a sincere one who keeps trying to improve. My spirit finds comfort in the bosom of God, Jesus, Mary, and all the saints. If I had only one book I could read for the rest of my life, it would be the Bible. When I think ahead to the afterlife, I smile. I can’t wait to be one with God then, and I struggle to divest myself of the hindrances that keep me from oneness with him today. As Saint Paul said, “I die daily.” I feel my faith very keenly and can almost always be appealed to by Biblical principles, the chief among them being love. This is not to suggest that I always, 100% of the time, walk in love; I don’t. But in theory I would like to.
Love is no doubt the most difficult of the virtues, for it seems to inevitably require self-sacrifice and putting oneself in the other person’s shoes. I don’t want to do that sometimes, preferring my own rights, needs, feelings, and judgments to those of my neighbor. Surely if they were as enlightened as I, they would see things my way! Though this selfish habit is entirely predictable and human, as a person of faith I’d like to be more like Jesus and less like my lower self much of the time.
the spirit of Esau
Given my faith, it was inevitable that once I was fully alive to the fact that we were being cheated by people to whom we had given our trust, I would turn to God in prayer. I turned,
too, to the book that tells about God and his ways, the Bible. I prayed and read the Bible a lot after realizing that we were being cheated. I fretted, chewed, and mulled things over. Finally, after a few months of this, things began to settle inside and I began to feel very still and quiet about my predicament. Then some event would occur with our partners to stir me up again, I’d get to see where my disquiet came from, and I would have yet another opportunity to work on myself, all of which I considered to be good things.
Seven months passed in this manner and, though from time to time I had feelings about being cheated or about the people who had cheated us, for the most part in my deepest and dearest self, I was very sure that God had me in his hands and I needed no other champion. When I happened to think of our partners, I shuddered for them because of the perilous positions into which they’d put themselves by violating their covenant. For the most part, though, I began to accept the truth. Then one day as I went about my household tasks, thinking about other things, a voice or thought spoke from that deep well inside of me and said that the principal in our covenant had “the spirit of Esau.” Like the fool I often am when such bits information are given me, I immediately challenged the voice with a sort of “who goes there?!” upon which the spirit fell entirely silent.
Though I have read the Bible from cover to cover more than once and can quote whole passages and nearly an entire chapter of the book of Proverbs by memory, there are many parts and characters with which I’m mostly unfamiliar, Esau being among them. I’ve never been a big fan of the Esau and Jacob story for various reasons. I did, though, have some rudimentary knowledge about them. I knew, of course, that Esau was the twin brother of the Jewish patriarch, Jacob, whose name was later changed to Israel. I recalled that Esau, being born first and thus the elder twin, had received the “birthright” of the firstborn son, which was no small thing among the ancient Hebrews. Jacob, however, whose name means “supplanter,” had his brother by the heel at birth, a sign of things to come; from birth, Jacob’s every intention was to obtain the covenant blessing of the firstborn son.
symbolic language
The incomprehensible, holy, creative, eternal life-giving Spirit many of us know as “God” has a language, and that language is symbolic. It is a language of words, which ground us in
reality and give us a means of communicating what is—the stuff of this world–and it is also a language of symbols, pictures, and images that communicate the eternal things of the spirit realm. Jung believed that normal people without symbols “to act as an outlet for their libido” inevitably “feel restricted and discontented” (Symbols of Transformation, CW Vol. 5, 342). Whether they are Christian, Buddhist, Muslim, Taoist, humanist, religious or otherwise, people need their symbols. The most irreligious but conscious person will be a person of reality and words, and also a person of intuition and symbols. The symbols need not be religious, but religious and classical symbols (such as those found in mythology) have the weight of history and common knowledge that other symbols do not. In addition, religious symbols communicate the things of the spirit to spiritual beings. I am therefore a big believer in symbolic religion which has great potential for communicating the things of God to mortals.
Because I am a person of faith, the intuitive and spiritual information I need during my quest of personal wholeness often arises through the Christian symbols with which I am most familiar. A devout and awake Jew, Buddhist, or Muslim would most likely receive messages from the spirit or the unconscious through their respective symbols. However, being non-religious does not excuse an individual from being susceptible to symbolic language for, in psychological fact, all humans have innards that speak and are spoken to through images and symbols. There is therefore no sustainable reason for any of us to be put off by the symbols of another person’s faith (or lack of it). There is no need to reject the symbol of the unconscious simply because it arises from a religion, practice, or belief system from which we consciously recoil. Once I was spoken to by a pair of peahens walking in tandem down the middle of the street in my suburban neighborhood, and there was nothing denominationally religious about them. For several months that year, in fact, the symbol of the peacock and the peahen recurred so that I would be sure to understand that some deep magic was at work.
So it was that when the name of Esau rose from my deep well, I understood Esau as more than an historic figure of legendary struggles fought in the world of reality, facts, and reason. I also understood him as a symbol of something, and Jacob as a symbol of something else, and the birthright over which these brothers wrangled to be another thing entirely.
Because of my penchant for analytic psychology, I understood that I had a puzzle to assemble or a code to decipher. I must discover what “spirit of Esau” means. I would have understood this assignment even if the symbol given me had been a peacock, an elephant, or hot air balloons recurring through dreams, conversations, or real-life sightings. I would know by the strength of emotion accompanying the symbol, by its repetition, or by the force or magic with which it presented itself that this symbolic landscape was one I should and must explore and map if I wanted to learn and grow as a human being.

As an example, I began writing about what I learned this
Now, that’s a lot of information to get from one dream. But after I woke up and journaled the dream, I found myself weeping for my loss of freedom as a child, and over the fear of my mother I’d felt for so many years, even for years after I’d given up the fantasy that some day I’d be close to her.
This is what Jung wrote. Put another way, King Solomon wrote that “bad company corrupts good morals.” One’s own individual way is easily lost through the influence of the collective, which is perhaps the biggest obstacle to the individual’s psychological health. The way to wholeness comes first from being prepared to live with the collective in healthy ways by having been raised in a healthy, loving, nurturing, accepting family. One then launches in a healthy, loving, nurturing, accepting way and goes out to live a healthy, loving, nurturing, accepting life by individuating—”leaving and cleaving,” as the Bible puts it—by becoming one. I do not speak with regard to marriage, here, but with regard to the Divine Marriage, the hieros gamos, the Holy Marriage. This is how life works at its best, if we have been loved.
The thing is that we can never become individuated while clinging to collective norms. The collective mind tells us how to live, what we should do for a living, how we should dress, what cars we should drive, what neighborhoods we should live in. Be responsible, do the right thing, do things in order; don’t push, don’t be rude, don’t be mean; respect your elders. “Don’t talk bad about Grandma; she’s old; we have to be nice to her; Be Nice.” When young people launch from the childhood home into a collective that looks as perfectly typecast as actors in a serialized drama or comedy, one can be sure that they are just as trapped as they were in their childhood homes. By the time they are 35 or 40 and have their two children and their so-called dream home that gives them all the right feelings, they will be filled with all the wrong feelings because the collective mind is corrupting and evil in the sense that it numbs people and leads them away from what only they can offer the world: their own selves.
And yet we hesitate to act in harmony with our own selves, for it was our earliest influences who taught most of us that our selves were to be rejected. Whether the collective was the family or the kindergarten class, we had to get in line and cooperate, and all too often “getting in line” meant giving up our true selves.
I thought then that Tolstoy’s idea that every unhappy family is unhappy in its own way was true, and I think so today. Because each person’s life experience is unique to them, and the way they receive and interpret these experiences also unique, it seems possible to decipher a person’s patterns only in an intimate, even one-on-one relationship. It can take years, and even then it’s hardly likely that one person can come to understand another. It’s more likely that, after much work, we may be able to understand ourselves. Jung said so and I also tend to agree with him. Lord knows that it seems to be a full time job for me to continue to gain personal insight. I often think that the best gift I can give to anyone else, therefore, is the gift of the possibility of true self consciousness. The only gift we really have to give is ourselves. As Jesus said, “let your light shine.”
The thing is that all the knowledge and wisdom in the universe are available to us, even at our fingertips. We are blessed among so many previous generations of people, because we have Google, and YouTube (for starters). Why, you can watch just about anyone’s teaching on YouTube, or read transcripts or even whole books by Googling them. There’s really no excuse for the westerner to continue to be unconscious, a walking wounded refusing to become healed.
troubled, discombobulated family of origin and then suddenly become a healthy, functioning, loving adult at age 21. Or even by age 31. One must have substantial help navigating through all the developmental phases one missed during the first 20+ years. If you’re lucky, a conscious, healthy spouse can offer re-parenting, but this is the exception rather than the rule. Most loopy people pick mates who will perfectly re-create what their parents gave them. We all say we won’t do it, and that we didn’t do it, and we will argue against it, but the sad fact is that these things don’t just go away by themselves. As Saint Paul wrote, I know that what I want to do is right, but the doing of it isn’t in me, and even when I try to do it, I can’t do it: “Helpless wretch that I am! Who will deliver me?!” In other words, it’s a fantastic, desperate struggle.
life numbly, and suddenly for a moment, we’re not numb or asleep or unconscious. Often, another person says something to us. A friend may suggest something. Or the pain finally becomes so great that we ask ourselves, “What’s wrong with me?”
The numbing and fleeing continue until the person gets tired of being a slave to that Wound. But just being tired of the wound guarantees nothing. Really, the idea of going all the way to nothingness, as Buddha suggested, or to dying (metaphorically) as Jesus suggested, is just about right. When one’s whole identity has been wrapped up in the Wound, it will indeed feel like annihilation or death to identify with anything other than Wound.
After several years of being truly loved, she struck out on her own. She alienated others and bred mistrust, fear, and dislike in everyone who actually loved her. She aligned herself with fake people. She became the worst best facsimile of “Trailer Trash.” When she became a mother, she moved every single year in the name of prosperity, dragging young children with her, continually moving up, up, up. She separated her children from healthy people and continued to value time with people and places where image was the most imporant thing.
And that’s exactly what happened. She’s now so far away from real love and esteem and healthy living that I know of no healthy people with ongoing relationships with her. Her intimates are people who are like her—no surprises there.
solar plexus, or wherever you feel it. The next time you are outraged. The next time tears could shoot out of your eyes. The next time you lie to defend yourself. The next time you use another human being. The next time you dishonor your gift or the gift of others, or the sacrifice that was made: make a list. Ask your Wound its name. Find out how it looks. How it acts. How it feels and smells. How you feel when you are in it. How you imagine you’ll feel when you aren’t. What you imagine as the antidote—and make an antidote list, for the antidote is always just the opposite of the Wound.

